aggressive growth investment strategy SMA

Aggressive Growth Investment Strategy

Investment Model Description

The Riverbend Aggressive Growth Investment Strategy is a long/short investment model based on statistical probability of historical market returns when compared to volatility and risk.

The strategy gauges the overall market outlook to determine what type of market cycle we are in, then invests the portfolio to match based on risk and volatility.

Please see Investment Philosophy and Strategy Overview

Strategy Overview


The Market Condition for the investment strategy is determined by the number of (proprietary) timeframe indicators that are positive.

aggressive growth investment strategy chart

When a positive reading is indicated, the portfolio is fully invested in leveraged index mutual funds.

When a neutral reading is indicated, the portfolio is invested in cash and will look for short-term opportunities based on historical market trends.

When negative reading is indicated, the strategy invests in leveraged inverse index mutual funds

Target Portfolio Metrics*

The Riverbend Aggressive Growth Investment Strategy is designed around the following portfolio metrics:

Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)21.5%
Maximum Drawdown (MaxDD)-27.8%
Correlation vs S&P 500 Index.15
Average Beta of Portfolio.22
Up Capture127%
Down Capture44.1%
Standard Deviation (annual)21.9%
To view formulas definitions for the above metrics, please click here: 

Investment Strategy Performance

sample aggressive growth investment strategy

To Request A Factsheet with Historical Performance Information, Please Click Here.


Targeted Risk metrics are generated from a backtested portfolio for the date range 10/1/2006 to 6/9/2018.

Backtesting involves a hypothetical reconstruction, based on past market data, of what the performance of a particular account would have been had the adviser been managing the account using a particular investment strategy.  Performance results presented do not represent actual trading using client assets but were achieved through the retroactive application of a model that was designed with the benefit of hindsight. Backtested performance results have inherent limitations, particularly the fact that these results do not represent actual trading and may not reflect the impact that material economic and market factors might have placed on the adviser’s decision-making if the adviser were actually managing the client’s money. These results should not be viewed as indicative of the adviser’s skill and do not reflect the performance results that were achieved by any particular client. During this period, the adviser was not providing advice using this model and clients’ results were materially different. The model that gave rise to these backtested performance results is one that the adviser is now using in managing clients’ accounts. Hypothetical performance returns are presented using Riverbend maximum annual fee of 2% net-of-fees (but do not account for fees that may be added by the custodian firm).